Marketing playbook · for law firms and solo attorneys
Law firm marketing playbook: earn trust before the first consultation
Nobody hires a lawyer from an ad. They hire the one whose article explained their problem clearly at 11pm. Legal marketing is also the field where a careless word becomes a bar complaint. This playbook covers the questions people search, how to write on each platform, and the wording to stay away from.
Start here: three pieces to publish first
-
01
A "what happens next" guide for your main practice area
Step by step, from first call to outcome, with timelines and costs in ranges. It is the page people read twice before they book.
-
02
A page per common question, with a clear disclaimer
Do I need a lawyer for this? How much will it cost? How long does it take? One focused page each.
-
03
A short LinkedIn post on each change in the law you follow
Peers refer work to the lawyer who explains changes first and plainly.
This is the same Law firm playbook ADpilot's writer reads before it drafts anything for a business like yours. Use it on your own, or let the machine work through it for you.
Who you are selling to
- Consumer plaintiff - life-event-driven (injury, divorce, criminal charge, immigration). Frightened, comparing 2-3 firms. Wants empathy + clarity + free-consult low-friction CTA.
- Estate-planning client - 45-75, planning-ahead mindset. Wants thoroughness, credentials, peer-recognition signals. Long sales cycle.
- Small-business owner - LLC formation, contracts, employment, IP. Cost-sensitive. Wants flat-fee transparency and outside-counsel access.
- Mid-market in-house counsel - vendor of last resort. Wants substantive expertise signal, prior similar-matter experience, conflict-clear roster.
- Referring attorney - peer who could send overflow or specialty matter. Wants reputation, malpractice-clean record, fee-split clarity.
- Loved-one researcher - the daughter or spouse Googling on behalf of the actual prospect. Wants accessibility, jargon-free explanation, "what to expect" content.
Questions your customers type into Google
Each one is a page or a post waiting to be written. Answer it better than anyone nearby and the person searching becomes a lead. Swap the brackets for your own name, town or product.
- "How much does a [type] lawyer cost?"
- "Do I need a lawyer for [situation]?"
- "Can I file [type of case] pro se?"
- "What is the statute of limitations for [claim] in [state]?"
- "How long does a [type of case] take?"
- "What should I bring to a consultation?"
- "Can I fire my attorney?"
- "Are attorney fees tax-deductible?"
- "What is a contingency fee?"
- "How do I find a good lawyer near me?"
- "What happens at a free consultation?"
- "Does my insurance cover a lawyer?"
- "Can a lawyer refuse my case?"
- "What is probate and do I need it?"
- "How do I know if I have a case?"
- "Is an attorney the same as a lawyer?"
What to post, platform by platform
- LinkedIn - strongest channel for thought leadership + referring-attorney reach. Topic-of-the-week threads, case-law commentary, "what changed in [practice area] this quarter." Include jurisdictional scope; never give specific legal advice in replies; include "Attorney Advertising" / "not legal advice" depending on jurisdiction.
- YouTube Long - "What to know before [event]" explainers (DUI stop, divorce filing, business contract review); 8-15min; chapters; pinned comment with disclaimers + state-specific resources; monetisation OK for general info, NOT for direct solicitation.
- YouTube Short / IG Reel / TikTok - "5 things judges hate to see," statute-of-limitations countdown explainers, common mistakes. NEVER answer specific case facts; broad educational only.
- Instagram Carousel - "[practice area] FAQ" or "what happens at a [event]"; jurisdiction badge on first slide; disclaimers on last slide.
- Blog / Website - long-form ranking content for "[practice area] near me" + "how much does a [type] lawyer cost in [state]" queries; schema markup for LegalService + Attorney; FAQPage schema.
- Reddit - usually a discipline risk; default DO NOT promote. Authentic prior comment history acceptable for educational explainers; never give specific advice to OP.
Your content calendar
Publish ahead of each moment. Search interest starts climbing weeks before the date.
- Statute of limitations windows: drive PI / employment / wage-and-hour lead-gen - state-specific SOL reminder content.
- Tax season (Jan-Apr): estate planning + tax controversy content windows.
- End of year: estate-planning, business-year-end, charitable-giving content.
- Spring/summer: family-law (divorce, custody, school-year transitions), personal-injury (seasonal auto accidents).
- Fall: back-to-school (education law, special education), estate planning post-vacation.
- Significant court rulings (SCOTUS + circuit courts): commentary permissible with jurisdictional scope + "not legal advice" caveats.
- Legislative changes: when new statutes take effect - e.g., state wage-and-hour amendments, new privacy laws, NIL legislation, ABC-test expansions.
- Disaster declarations: FEMA disaster-recovery legal aid needed; content should direct to local legal aid first.
Claims and practices to avoid
General guidance from our industry notes, not legal advice. The exact rules depend on your country and regulator.
- "Guarantee" / "guaranteed win" / "we guarantee [outcome]"
- "Best lawyer" / "top attorney" / "#1 firm" - comparative superlatives without verifiable basis are restricted or banned
- "Win your case" / "we will win" / "no losses" - outcome promises prohibited
- "Get you millions" / "we'll recover millions" / "big money settlement"
- "Specialist" / "expert" (without board certification in applicable state)
- "Aggressive" (prohibited/restricted in some states - e.g., FL historically limited)
- "Sue the doctor / insurer / employer" - solicitation framing problematic in many states
- "Fix a DUI" / "beat the charges" / "make it go away"
- "Call now or lose your rights forever" - high-pressure solicitation language
- "Free consult - limited time" (when it isn't) - deceptive practice
- "Over 1,000 cases won" (without substantiation)
- "Recovered $X million" in general (must be specific, per-case, and with "results may vary" disclaimer where permitted)
- "Attorneys the insurance companies fear"
- Implying judgeship influence ("judges know us")
- "No risk" - every matter has risk
- "Immigration miracle" / "asylum guaranteed" / "get your green card"
- "We will get you [outcome]"
- Case testimonials reciting outcomes without per-state disclaimers
- Client photos + named cases without consent and HIPAA-equivalent for sensitive matters
- Simulated client scenes without "Dramatization" disclosure
- "Pre-approved" / "qualified" solicitations outside direct-mail exceptions
- Offers of inducements prohibited by Rule 7.3 (gifts/discounts for referrals from clients regulated state-by-state)
Let the machine run this playbook
ADpilot turns the questions above into long-form articles built from live Google results, and the angles into native posts for each platform you connect. The claims list goes into every brief, and eight quality gates check each draft before it reaches your approval queue. You approve, it publishes, then it watches what ranks and what people engage with, and writes the next piece with that in mind.